In short. A revision is the last step of an assessment, not the first. What history, examination, imaging and capsule findings contribute, and how they decide it.

Key points

  • The useful question is specific: is there a rupture, is there a collection, has the capsule changed, is there a lump that needs its own assessment?
  • Imaging is ordered to answer one of those.
  • The modality depends on your age, your history and the question being asked, and surveillance is repeated on a schedule rather than performed once.

A revision is the last step of an assessment rather than the first, and the assessment is what separates a breast that needs an operation from one that needs a plan and a review date. The work-up has four parts, and each answers a different question.

The history, taken properly

The first question is what is actually in the breast. When were the implants placed, by whom, what type and size, and are they under the muscle or over it? Have they been exchanged before? Is there an implant card or a device record? Then the symptom: what changed, when, is it one side or both, is it progressing, is there pain or fever, and was there any injury to the chest. That history is what turns a set of findings into a diagnosis, and it is the part of the assessment a patient can prepare for.

Examination of both breasts

Both breasts are examined even when only one is a concern, because the other side is the baseline. The assessment records firmness and how it compares, the shape and position of the implant, whether the fold has moved, the state of the scars and the skin, and whether there is a lump that is distinct from the implant. Examination alone rarely settles whether an implant has ruptured, and it is not expected to.

Imaging answers a question; it is not a screening ritual

The useful question is specific: is there a rupture, is there a collection, has the capsule changed, is there a lump that needs its own assessment? Imaging is ordered to answer one of those. The modality depends on your age, your history and the question being asked, and surveillance is repeated on a schedule rather than performed once.

What the capsule contributes

A capsule forms around every implant, and the assessment asks whether it has contracted, how thick it is, and whether it is intact. That finding is what decides whether the operation is an exchange alone or an exchange with removal of the capsule, and those are materially different operations with different recoveries.

Infection and fluid, excluded or treated

Redness, heat, pain, fever or a collection change the entire plan. An infected field is treated first and any operation waits, because operating through infection risks losing the implant and worse. Fluid around an implant is sampled rather than assumed, and a late collection is investigated rather than drained and forgotten.

The conversation that ends the work-up

You should leave with clear answers: what the finding is, whether it needs treatment now, what the options are, and what happens if you choose to wait. Where the finding is stable and the symptoms are tolerable, observation with a review date is a plan rather than a delay. Where an operation is recommended, the recommendation should say which operation, why that one, and what it is expected to change.

Seek care rather than waiting if

  • A breast becomes hard, painful or visibly distorted while you are waiting for assessment.
  • Redness, heat, a fever or fluid from a wound appear — contact your treating team now, and if the team cannot be reached go to the nearest emergency department.
  • You become breathless, develop chest pain, or notice a swollen painful calf.

Related reading

Frequently asked questions

What imaging is used to assess a breast implant?

Which modality is used depends on your age, your history and what is being looked for, and it is a decision for the assessing clinician rather than a fixed pathway. What matters is that the imaging is ordered to answer a specific question rather than performed as a routine.

Do I need my original implant records?

They help a great deal, because they say what was placed, when, and where it sits. Without them the assessment still proceeds, and a tertiary hospital assesses patients who were operated on elsewhere routinely. Bring whatever you have, including an implant card.

Can the assessment end without an operation?

Yes, and that is a legitimate outcome. A stable finding with no symptoms may be observed with a review date rather than operated on. Revision is offered when the problem justifies the risks of a second operation.

Risks & Limitations

  • Implants are not lifetime devices. Rupture can be silent, and exchange at some point in your life is likely.
  • Capsular contracture — firmness, distortion or discomfort caused by the scar tissue that forms around an implant.
  • A ruptured or leaking implant, which may produce no symptoms at all and be found only on imaging.
  • Infection, seroma or a wound that does not close after any breast operation.
  • Anaesthesia and surgical risks, which are generally higher for a second operation than for a first.
  • Scarring, and change in breast or nipple sensation.
  • No revision can guarantee a particular shape, size or symmetry, and further surgery may be needed.

When to Seek Care

  • A breast that becomes hard, painful, red or hot, or a fever — contact your treating team now, and if the team cannot be reached go to the nearest emergency department.
  • Sudden swelling, a new lump, or a change in the size or shape of one breast.
  • Fluid, discharge or a wound that opens along a scar.
  • Breathlessness, chest pain or a swollen painful calf — seek emergency care immediately.
  • Any change in a breast, or in how an implant feels, that worries you.

References & Further Reading

  • American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) — guidance on implant safety and surveillance
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — breast implant rupture and surveillance information
  • National Medical Products Administration (NMPA, China) — device approval and traceability
  • Chongqing West District Hospital — Plastic Surgery & Aesthetics Medical Center

Medically reviewed by Tongchun Mao, MD (毛彤春), Deputy Director & Head of Aesthetic Surgery. Last reviewed: 19 September 2026.

This page is patient education, not medical advice, and it does not cite individual studies. Discuss your own case with a qualified clinician. To arrange an assessment at Chongqing West District Hospital, see Contact & Consultation.